Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 SW2D 265 - State v. Staten

State v. Staten’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2008

8 state decisions

301972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dunn v. United States · State v. Cline · State v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]urglary is a constituent element of a stealing charge under the statute and a jury verdict such as this is not merely inconsistent. It shows conclusively that the jury has failed to find a constituent element of the offense and therefore it cannot stand.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.