Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 S.W.2d 552 - Milligan v. State

Milligan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1977
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Soto v. State · Degay v. State · Alvarez v. State · Bell v. State · Beaty v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Said defendant in person together with his counsel and the attorney representing the State of Texas further agrees and consents in writing in open court to the introduction of testimony on behalf of the State by affidavits, written statements of witnesses, and any other documentary evidence that may be offered in support of any judgment that may be entered in said cause, all of which are attached hereto, marked Exhibit Nos. 2-13 inclusive and made a part hereof. Said defendant in person together with his counsel and the attorney representing the State of Texas further agrees that such exhibits and stipulations as well as this instrument may be considered as a part of the Statement of Facts in said cause, and that such stipulated evidence is true and correct. Defendant in person with counsel and State’s counsel further agree and stipulate and defendant judically (sic) confesses that on August 7, 1971 he unlawfully took from the possession of Eva D. Beeder — one automobile of the value of $50.00 or more without her permission and with the intent to appropriate same to his use and benefit. “Said defendant in person together with his counsel and the attorney representing the State of Texas agrees and stipulates that he, the said defendant, is the identical person referred to in the attached exhibits and stipulated evidence, and if the above referred-to witnesses were present and testifying under oath they would identify the defendant as the person of whom they speak in said exhi”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.