Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 SW2D 954 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
May 1995
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Williams v. Beto · Foster v. Beto · Meeks v. State · McNeese v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The practice of law is an art as well as a science. As no two men can be exactly alike in the practice of the profession, it is basically unreasonable to judge an attorney by what another would have done, or says he would have done, in the better light of hindsight.” See also Morgan v. State, 403 S.W.2d 150 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Boykin v. State, 487 S. W.2d 128 (Tex.Cr.App.1972).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.