¶1OPINION
¶2This is an appeal from a conviction for robbery by assault. Punishment was assessed by the jury at thirty years.
¶3Appellant’s court-appointed counsel, for appeal, filed an affidavit with the trial court reciting that he had examined the record, researched all applicable law and concluded that there are no grounds in the record for appeal that would not be frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493; Gainous v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 436 S.W.*9582d 137. A copy of this affidavit was furnished appellant.
¶4Appellant has failed a pro se brief.
¶5We have considered the grounds urged in appellant’s pro se brief and find them to be wholly without merit.
¶6The judgment is affirmed.
¶7Opinion approved by the Court.