Lamont v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2001
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · Chevy Chase Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Council · Williams v. District of Columbia · 446 F. Supp. 791 - Dual v. Griffin · O'Neill v. District of Columbia Office of Human Rights
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“They [respondents] maintain that her [petitioner] available remedies are limited to those spelled out in section 19(b)... which does not mention compensatory damages. We reject this argument because section 19(b) also states that remedial actions ... `need not be limited' to those enumerated. Thus it may be that there are more remedies available to petitioner under the Human Rights Law than under Title VII. But she has not sought compensatory damages.... Absent any claim for further damages, the purported disparity in the available remedies makes no difference ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ny person suffering a legal wrong, or adversely affected or aggrieved by, an order or decision of the Commission in a matter, pursuant to the provisions of this chapter is entitled to a judicial review thereof, in accordance with § 1-1510, 9 upon filing, in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, a written petition for such review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ny person suffering a legal wrong, ... by an order or decision of ... an agency in a contested case, is entitled to a judicial review ... [by] the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.