Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 479 A.2d 1284 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2004

7 state decisions

50198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Murphy v. Florida · Rideau v. Louisiana · Beck v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) when the publicity so taints the atmosphere surrounding the trial that it must be presumed under principles of constitutional due process that the jury was prejudiced; 2) when the defendant demonstrates actual prejudice on the part of the venire persons sufficient to require reversal as a matter of due process; or 3) when denial of the motion amounted to an abuse of discretion under state law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is well established that where a statement has been introduced by one party, the party opponent may introduce the remainder of the statement, even though favorable to the party opponent’s case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.