State v. Rowe’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2006
1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Casale · State v. Bleyl · State v. Anderson · State v. Ledger · State v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ur rule requires the State to produce, exclusive of any confession or admission of the defendant, such credible evidence as will create a substantial belief that the crime charged has been committed by some person. The trial judge is to evaluate the evidence. The degree of proof of the corpus delicti exclusive of the defendant’s statements need not be beyond a reasonable doubt but resembles the probable cause standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Chabot“manner in which the Defendant is alleged to have caused the death.” 6 . We here make explicit what has been implicit in many of our prior cases. Past considerations of the sufficiency of corpus delicti evidence "exclusive of any admission or confession of the defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Libby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.