Kubik v. Goldfield’s Empirical Analysis
479 F.2d 472 · 1973
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently January 2007 · most notably Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance (1980), Keiser v. Coliseum Properties, Inc. (1980)
11 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 771 (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) · 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77D (§ 4 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77E (§ 5 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77L (§ 12 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77M (§ 13 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc. · Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities Corporation · Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton · Securities and Exchange Commission v. North American Research and Development Corp., Edward White and K. Ralph Bowman, Securities and Exchange Commission v. North American Research and Development Corp., and Martin Orenzoff, Alfred Blumberg, Lewis Dillman and Lars Hagglof & Co., Ltd. · Gilbert v. Nixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) transactions by a dealer (including an underwriter no longer acting as an underwriter in respect of the security involved in such transaction), except— (A) transactions taking place prior to the expiration of forty days after the first date upon which the security was bona fide offered to the public by the issuer or by or through an underwrit-er_”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.