Doe v. Gillman’s Empirical Analysis
479 F.2d 646 · 1973
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 1995
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Shapiro v. Thompson · Wyman v. James · Haines v. Kerner · Diffenderfer v. Central Baptist Church of Miami, Florida, Inc. · Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Prepmore Apparel, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When the hearing decision is favorable to the claimant, or when the agency decides in favor of a claimant prior to the hearing, corrective payments, retroactive to the date of incorrect action, shall be made.” (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“from persons legally responsible for said support.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.