Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 479 F.2d 653 - Arney v. United States

Arney v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

479 F.2d 653 · 1973

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
4
states following
October 1994
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently October 1994 · most notably Egger v. Phillips (1983), 37 Cal. 3d 540 - Elsworth v. Beech Aircraft Corp. (1984)

25 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

240197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1333 · 49 U.S.C. § 1321 · 49 U.S.C. § 308

Relies on Rodriquez v. United States · Alarid v. Vanier · Hamilton C. Bushie and Doris Ann Bushie v. Stenocord Corporation · Roucher v. Traders & General Insurance · McGuire v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'(i) ssues of negligence are ordinarily not susceptible of summary adjudication.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “at least one viable theory of law under (his) asserted version of the facts that would, if true, entitle the opponent of the motion to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the government may be liable for negligence in improper issuance of a type airworthiness certificate,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.