Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 479 F.3d 1213 - Troff v. III

Troff v. III’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
March 2007
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1328 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 28 U.S.C. § 158

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Kelly v. Robinson · Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Davenport · Gaylor v. United States · Rashid v. Powel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not applicable in this case because the payments here are forwarded to the victim. 19 Mr. Troff's observation that Kelly's holding reaches beyond its facts is correct. Yet, the Kelly Court's reasoning made clear that it would apply the rule to any obligation imposed as part of a criminal sentence. See Id. at 53, 107 S.Ct. 353 (holding that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “). Furthermore, even if we disagreed with the breadth of Kelly's holding or its rationale, we are not free to blaze our own trail because”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “payable to and for the benefit of a governmental unit and [ ] not compensation for actual pecuniary loss.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.