479 F. Supp. 2d 304 - Hall v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Morrissey v. Brewer · Ex Parte: Edward T Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“allegation that [plaintiff's] rap sheet erroneously recites that he was arrested for murder obviously ... qualifies as 'stigma' "). Drawing all reasonable inferences in Frascatore's favor, the statement he attributes to "NYPD Sources”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Frascatore v. Blake
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.