Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 479 NW2D 293 - Spencer v. Spencer

Spencer v. Spencer’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2013

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

80199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Asay v. Hallmark Cards, Inc. · Vinson v. Linn-Mar Community School District · Beeck v. Kapalis · Kiner v. Reliance Insurance Co. · Rees v. O'MALLEY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The assessment of damages is traditionally a jury function. Its decision should be disturbed only for the most compelling reasons. We will reduce or set aside a jury award only if it (1) is flagrantly excessive or inadequate; or (2) is so out of reason as to shock the conscience or sense of justice; or (3) raises a presumption it is a result of passion, prejudice, or other ulterior motive; or (4) is lacking in eviden-tiary support.... The most important of the above enumerated tests is support in the evidence. If the verdict has support in the evidence the others will hardly arise, if it lacks support they all may arise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A party to a private litigation or a private prosecutor or defendant in a criminal prosecution is absolutely privileged to publish defamatory matter concerning another in communications preliminary to a proposed judicial proceeding, or in the institution of or during the course and as a part of, a judicial proceeding in which he participates, if the matter has some relation to the proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.