Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 479 P3D 176 - State v. Phillips

State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

2021

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Ward · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · State v. Plummer · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) A prosecutor may commence a criminal prosecution upon a determination of probable cause.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] defendant's right to statutory immunity should be adjudicated at the early stages of the proceeding based on the evidentiary record submitted at the motion hearing. Otherwise, the immunity protections afforded by our Legislature would be rendered meaningless if the resolution of the immunity question, including disputed facts relevant to it, were delayed until trial. Moreover, these decisions illustrate an important difference in the injury a defendant potentially suffers as a result of immunity-related errors, compared to other trial errors. With other trial errors, the defendant's potential harm or injury relates to the fairness or legitimacy of the jury's verdict. However, in the case of immunity-related error, the potential harm or injury is the continued prosecution of the case in violation of defendant's statutory right to immunity. Quite simply, immunity error does not implicate the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) A person who uses force which, subject to the provisions of K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21-5226, and amendments thereto, is justified pursuant to K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21- 5222, 21-5223 or 21-5225, and amendments thereto, is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force . . . . As used in this subsection,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.