479 So. 2d 1377 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably 548 So. 2d 526 - Hallford v. State (1988), 584 So. 2d 872 - Holder v. State (1991)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Town of Mashpee v. Mashpee Tribe · Taylor v. Alabama · Cobern v. State · Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"I charge you members of the jury, that even if the defendant killed the victim for some purpose unrelated to the theft, the taking of the property from the victim after the murder constitutes robbery, if the murder and the subsequent taking of the property formed a continuous chain of events.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“in the course of or in connection with the commission of, or in immediate flight from the commission of”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““(b) Separation of Jurors in Noncapital Felony Trials. “(1) In any prosecution for a noncapital felony, the trial court, in its discretion, may permit the jury trying the ease to separate during the pendency of the trial. “(2) A separation of the jury so permitted under Rule 19.3(b) shall create a prima facie presumption that the accused was not prejudiced by reason of the separation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mount v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.