Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 479 So. 2d 1385 - Oliver v. State

479 So. 2d 1385 - Oliver v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2011

21 state decisions

1401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Ross · Sedillo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The purpose of establishing a chain of custody is to show a reasonable probability that there has been no tampering with the item of evidence. Bell v. State, 339 So.2d 96 (Ala.Crim.App.1976). In passing upon the admissibility of such evidence, `the trial judge should consider the nature of the article and the circumstances surrounding its preservation and custody,' and permit its introduction where continuity of possession is `sufficiently established to afford ample assurances of ... authenticity.'"”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"When a trial court declares a mistrial, it all but invariably contemplates that the prosecutor will be permitted to proceed anew notwithstanding the defendant's plea of double jeopardy. . . . Such a motion may be granted upon the initiative of either party or upon the court's own initiative. . . . [I]n passing on the propriety of a declaration of mistrial granted at the behest of the prosecutor or on the court's own motion, this Court has balanced `the valued right of a defendant to have his trial completed by the particular tribunal summoned to sit in judgment on him; Downum v. United States , 372 U.S. 734 , 736 , 83 S.Ct. 1033 , 1034 , 10 L.Ed.2d 100 (1963), against the public interest in insuring that justice is meted out to offenders."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “authorizes the warrantless search of a vehicle when the police initially have probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime, and if exigent circumstances exist.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.