479 So. 2d 260 - Armenia v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 383 So. 2d 1186 - Beugnet v. Beugnet · 377 So. 2d 17 - Baker v. State · J. A. C. v. State · 465 So. 2d 1309 - Higdon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IS IT NECESSARY TO PROVE THAT THERE WAS A CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANNER OF OPERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTOR VEHICLE OR HIS INABILITY TO AVOID THE ACCIDENT BECAUSE OF HIS INTOXICATION AND THE DEATH OF THE VICTIM TO CONVICT FOR A VIOLATION OF SECTION 316.1931, FLORIDA STATUTES (1983)?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is the killing of a human being . . . caused by the operation of a motor vehicle by another in a reckless manner likely to cause the death of, or great bodily harm to, another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reaves v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.