479 So. 2d 590 - State v. Augustus’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 393 So. 2d 1212 - State v. Moody · 459 So. 2d 31 - State v. Richardson · State v. Batiste · 426 So. 2d 1314 - State v. Richards · 301 So. 2d 619 - State v. Bates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the generally accepted view an entrapment is perpetrated when a law enforcement official or a person acting in cooperation with such an official, for the purpose of obtaining evidence of the commission of an offense, solicits, encourages, or otherwise induces another person to engage in conduct constituting such offense when he is not then otherwise disposed to do so.... The inquiry under this test goes beyond the fact that criminal conduct was committed at the instance of law enforcement officials. Once government instigation is shown, the inquiry focuses upon the predisposition of the defendant. Under this test, the ultimate question is whether the inducement by the officers or the defendant's own predisposition caused the criminal conduct in question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Marks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.