Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably State v. Brown (1992), Houston v. State (1980)
1 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harrington v. State · Jamison v. State · Smith v. State · Hunter v. State · Gann v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Every homicide is presumed to be malicious in the absence of circumstances rebutting this implied presumption. Harper v. State, 206 Tenn. 509 , 334 S.W.2d 933 ; Gann v. State, 214 Tenn. 711 , 383 S.W.2d 32 . “ ‘Killing with a deadly weapon raises a presumption of malice sufficient to justify a finding of murder in the second degree, in the absence of facts or circumstances rebutting that presumption. Nance v. State, 210 Tenn. 328 , 358 S.W.2d 327 ; Gann v. State, supra; Bostick v. State, 210 Tenn. 620 , 360 S.W.2d 472 ; Smith v. State, 212 Tenn. 510 , 370 S.W.2d 543 . “ ‘In such cases the burden is upon the State to establish that the killing constituted murder in the first degree, if such is charged, and the defendant has the burden of showing mitigating facts and circumstances sufficient to reduce the degree of the homicide below second degree murder. So it is that malice is an essential ingredient of murder in the second degree. Harper v. State, supra; Smith v. State, supra. If one person, upon a sudden impulse of passion, without adequate provocation, and disconnected with any previously formed design to kill, kills another willfully and maliciously, such killing is unlawful and is murder in the second degree. Malice is not necessarily confined to an intention to take the life of the deceased, but includes an intention to do any unlawful act which may probably result in depriving the party of life. It is not so much spite or malevolence to the individual in particular ”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Francis v. State · Braziel v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.