Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 Ala. App. 465 - Pryor v. State

48 Ala. App. 465 - Pryor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 1994

24 state decisions

120197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · 17 Ala. App. 674 - Dennison v. State · 46 Ala. App. 722 - Parks v. State · Moulton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`The offense of possession of illegal drugs is susceptible of joint commission. Green v. State, 30 Ala.App. 94 , 2 So.2d 324 [, cert. denied, 241 Ala. 288 , 2 So.2d 326 (1941)]; Gunnells v. State, 21 Ala.App. 648 , 111 So. 320 [(1927)]. Further the guilt of the accused does not necessarily depend upon proof of his ownership of the drugs. Womack v. State, 34 Ala.App. 487 , 41 So.2d 429 [(1949)]; Thompson v. State, 32 Ala. App. 402 , 27 So.2d 55 [, cert. denied, 248 Ala. 270 , 27 So.2d 59 (1946)]. However, there must be evidence from which the jury might conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant knew of the presence of the drugs. Such guilty knowledge may be established by circumstantial evidence. Womack v. State, supra; Thompson v. State, supra.'"”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.