48 Ala. App. 688 - Veith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
70 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently March 1991 · most notably 49 Ala. App. 233 - Thigpen v. State (1972), 333 So. 2d 193 - Retowsky v. State (1976)
70 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Jencks v. United States · Smith v. State · Sanders v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The general rule governing newly discovered evidence is to the effect that such must be shown to be unknown to appellant and could not have been discovered before trial in the exercise of due diligence. Further, that such evidence must be such as not merely cumulative or for impeachment merely, but rather must be of such nature as to be sufficient to probably change the result of the trial. Lackey v. State , 41 Ala. App. 46 , 123 So.2d 186 ; Washington v. State , 259 Ala. 104 , 65 So.2d 704 ; Hodge v. State , 32 Ala. App. 283 , 26 So.2d 274 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“be subjected to an interview just prior to the inception of trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Griffin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.