Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 App. D.C. 476 - Eisinger v. E. J. Murphy Co.

48 App. D.C. 476 - Eisinger v. E. J. Murphy Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1925
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Exchange Nat. Bank of Pittsburgh v. Third Nat. Bank of NY · Tuttle v. First National Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘Where the instrument contains or a person adds to his signature words indicating that he signs for or on behalf of a principal, or in a representative capacity, he is not liable on the instrument if he was duly authorized, but the mere addition of words describing him as an agent or as filling a representative character without disclosing his principal does not exempt him from personal liability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.