Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 B.R. 161 - In Re Thacker

In Re Thacker’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
January 2010
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably In Re Wildman (1987), In Re S.T.N. Enterprises, Inc. (1987)

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Rose Pass Mines, Inc. v. Howard · In Re Wilson Foods Corp. · In Re Werth · In Re Nation/Ruskin, Inc. · In Re Global International Airways Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]ompensable, out-of-pocket expenses are those which can be clearly and fairly charged to the Debtors. Court fees, transcription fees, out-of-town travel expenses, delivery service, long-distance telephone calls and postage expenses, are examples of expenses which can be clearly traced to an applicant's representation of Debtors, as opposed to the firm's other clients.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““(a) Application for Compensation or Reimbursement. A person seeking ... reimbursement of necessary expenses, from the estate shall file with the Court an application setting forth a detailed statement of (1) the service rendered, time expended and expenses incurred, and (2) the amounts requested.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.