Salsbery v. Ritter’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably 59 Cal. 2d 35 - Roseleaf Corp. v. Chierighino (1963), 59 Cal. 2d 901 - Zeitlin v. Arnebergh (1963)
56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 23 Cal. 2d 719 - Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society · 37 Cal. 2d 634 - Boren v. State Personnel Board · 47 Cal. 2d 540 - Bennett v. Hibernia Bank · 28 Cal. 2d 790 - California Physicians' Service v. Garrison · McMillan v. Richards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“diminish[ ] the possibility that a subsequent redemptioner will make payment to some person who because of an undisclosed intervening redemption no longer has any interest in the property”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.