48 Cal. 3d 100 - Bowles v. State Bar’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 39 Cal. 3d 18 - Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc. · 14 Cal. 3d 524 - In Re Kreamer · 43 Cal. 3d 543 - Greenbaum v. State Bar · 38 Cal. 3d 525 - Smith v. State Bar · 28 Cal. 3d 465 - Giovanazzi v. State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The notice initiating a [disciplinary] proceeding... may be served upon the member or former member of the State Bar to whom it is directed by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the member or former member at the latest address shown on the official membership records of the State Bar. The service is complete at the time of the mailing....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“actual notice is [not] a necessary element of proper service in disciplinary proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.