Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 Cal. 3d 247 - People v. Boyer

48 Cal. 3d 247 - People v. Boyer’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

175
cited by 175 later decisions
2
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

165 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 175 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably 9 Cal. 4th 83 - People v. Crittenden (1994), 15 Cal. 4th 1229 - People v. Bradford (1997)

165 state decisions

115019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Wong Sun v. United States · Simmons v. United States · Edwards v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 175 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the improper introduction of a confession is considered reversible per se [citations], whereas wrongful introduction of an admission is deemed prejudicial unless the People show beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In deciding the custody issue, the totality of circumstances is relevant, and no one factor is dispositive. [Citation.] However, the most important considerations include (1) the site of the interrogation, (2) whether the investigation has focused on the subject, (3) whether the objective indicia of arrest are present, and (4) the length and form of questioning.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The defendant may waive effectuation of [ Miranda ] rights, provided the waiver is made voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently. If, however, he indicates in any manner and at any stage of the process that he wishes to consult with an attorney before speaking there can be no questioning”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.