Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 CALAPP2D 495 - People v. Score

People v. Score’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
3
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently November 2010 · most notably 33 Cal. 3d 572 - People v. Fosselman (1983), State v. Noriega (1984)

5 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

17019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Hinshaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The person making the arrest must inform the person to be arrested of the intention to arrest him, of the cause of the arrest, and the authority to make it, except when the person making the arrest has reasonable cause to believe that the person to be arrested is actually engaged in the commission of or an attempt to commit an offense, or the person to be arrested is pursued immediately after its commission, or after an escape.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.