48 Cal. App. 4th 1663 - Erikson v. Weiner’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “for the purpose of determining whether or not the appellant was prejudiced by the error or errors upon which he relies for reversal or modification of the judgment from which the appeal is taken.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 176 Cal. App. 4th 51 - California Grocers Assn. v. City of Los Angeles · 86 Cal. App. 4th 222 - Melton v. Industrial Indemnity Co.

2. “(§ 659.) Once jurisdiction is established by motion, the trial court has to rule on the motion within 60 days from the mailing or service of notice of judgment or, if no notice was given, within 60 days after the notice of intention to move for a new trial. (§ 660.) Section 657 sets forth the possible grounds on which a trial court may grant a new trial motion. Section 658 provides that although such a motion generally may rely solely on the minutes of the court, a motion that relies on newly discovered evidence, juror misconduct, accident or surprise, or an irregularity in the proceedings”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2 Cal. 5th 330 - Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.

3. “the extension of time to file affidavits beyond the aggregate 30-day period provided in section 659a will almost always encroach upon the interests of the opposing party to her allotted time for response.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2 Cal. 5th 330 - Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.