State v. Duke’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2016
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Halper · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · United States v. Ursery · Hudson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because our legislature conferred the power to sanction on an administrative agency, we consider it prima facie evidence that the sanctions were intended to be civil rather than criminal in nature”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Because the issue of whether an administrative sanction constitutes punishment for purposes of double jeopardy is a question of law, [our] review [is] de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.