Menchaca v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 1975
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Zaloom Bros. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * fabrics and articles embroidered * * * by whatever name known, and to whatever use applied, and whether or not named, described, or provided for elsewhere in this Act, when composed wholly or in chief value of filaments, yarns, threads, tinsel wire, lame, bullions, metal threads, beads, bugles, spangles, or rayon or other synthetic textile * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“* * * articles * * * composed wholly or in chief value of paper lithographically printed in whole or in part * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Not wholly or in chief value of vegetable fiber-45% ad val.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.