Nelson v. The Majestic’s Empirical Analysis
48 F. 730 · 1891
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 1987
8 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nelson v. The Majestic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Be that as it may, however, it is plain, upon the proof, that a wave was thrown up by the steamer, which made navigation unsafe for the canal-boat, although she was, so far as appears, a proper craft to navigate the waters of the upper bay, and was attached to her tug in a proper way for towing with the natural conditions of wind and waves, such as they were that day. If, when moving at seven knots an hour, and the distance of half a mile, the Majestic produces such results, then there is something in her size or build which makes it necessary for her officers to be watchful of craft they pass at that distance, as well as of those in the immediate vicinity, and to regulate her motions accordingly. It will not do to say that the swell that she throws is no higher than such as are produced by a high wind in these waters. A high wind had not, on this particular day, rendered the bay unsafe for river craft. They, were entitled to navigate there, and the proposition cannot be maintained that harbor waters may be put at all times and at all seasons in a perilous condition for smaller craft, by the rapid movements of large ocean steamers, as they are occasionally by the prevalence of a gale of wind. Such waters are not to be appropriated to the exclusive use of any one class of vessels. We do not mean to hold that ocean steamers are to accommodate their movements to craft unfit to navigate the bay, either from inherent weakness, or overloading, or improper handling, or which are ca”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“•‘Nor will it do to say that the Majestic was navigating in the way and at the speed customarily adopted by vessels of her class. If such way and speed caused injury to a seaworthy craft of a hind properly in these1 waters and properly handled, the custom will have to be modified or the privilege paid for.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. The Hendrick Hudson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.