Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 F.2d 135 - Buck v. McLaughlin

Buck v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis

48 F.2d 135 · 1931

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
July 1968
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1968

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

501931194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 954

Relies on Eisner v. Macomber · Gould v. Gould · Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. · Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka · Stratton's Independence, Ltd. v. Howbert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Permanent alimony is regarded rather as a portion of the husband’s estate to which the wife is equitably entitled, than as strictly a debt; alimony from time to time may be regarded as a portion of his current income or earnings; * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.