The Linseed King’s Empirical Analysis
48 F.2d 311 · 1930
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 1998
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen · Leisy v. Hardin · Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde · Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co. · New York Central Railroad v. Winfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“One of the reasons for the result in the Hartfordcase was the inequity of sending claimants empty away, to begin new suits, after the owner had impeded them in the bringing of suits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.