Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 F.2d 635 - In re Bloomberg

In re Bloomberg’s Empirical Analysis

48 F.2d 635 · 1931

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
September 1961
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1961

2 federal appellate · 4 district ·

401931194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Falter v. Reinhard · In re Lewensohn · In re Rekersdres · Bollman v. Tobin · In re Henschel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As a practical matter, I am satisfied that in this proceeding Mr. Miller could administer the estate as well as any other person, and that the creditors’ interests might even be better subserved by him than by any other person, in view of the fact that he has now had charge of the estate for some two months. However, the complaint is not against him, but against the method used in securing his appointment." [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In no case should the appointment of a trustee ever be approved, regardless of who he is, when it appears that his selection has been, directly or indirectly, brought about by the bankrupt himself or those acting in his behalf.” In re Bloomberg, D.C., 48 F.2d 635 , at page 637.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.