Dodd v. Nix’s Empirical Analysis
48 F.3d 1071 · 1995
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably Mack v. Caspari (1996), United States v. Louper-Morris (2012)
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Neil v. Biggers · Rogers v. United States · Patterson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Absent contrary evidence, we accord this finding of fact a presumption of correctness under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d), and we decline to second-guess counsel's strategic decision on collateral review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nielsen v. Hopkins“[a]ny remaining concerns about the suggestiveness of the identification procedure or the reliability of the out-of-court identification were for the jury to resolve.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mack v. Caspari
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.