Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 F.3d 1082 - Allen

Allen’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Pb Nb Sg Lg Cd Dd v. Koch, 208 F. Supp. 2d 1125 - Munoz v. Kolender (2002)

2 district · 2 state decisions

210199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Wolff v. McDonnell · Mitchell v. Forsyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the absence of preexisting binding precedent within this circuit, this court look[s] at all available decisional law including decisions ... of other circuits to determine whether a plaintiff has shown that the illegality of a defendant's conduct should have been apparent when it occurred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A defendant cannot inject into an interlocutory appeal issues that are otherwise not immediately appealable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]t does not require sophisticated `legal scholarship' to know that a plaintiff's access [to] the courts could be hindered seriously by an inability to make multiple, accurate copies of legal documents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.