Harris v. Champion’s Empirical Analysis
48 F.3d 1126 · 1994
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 1999
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Rose v. Lundy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“rather than addressing the merits of plaintiff's exhausted due process claim arising from delay in adjudicating his direct criminal appeal, the district court should have either dismissed that claim, along with the unexhausted claims, or given petitioner an opportunity to resubmit his habeas petition raising only the exhausted claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Broadus v. Cowley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.