Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

48 F.3d 1217

Docket No. 94-7049.

Qureshi v. Rickards

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided March 9, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-03-09

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · In Re: Harrison A. Stephens

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-03-09

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Pervez A. Qureshi, appellant pro se.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens complaint.* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Qureshi v. Rickards, No. CA-94-847 (E.D. Va. August 26, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/48/f3d/1217 · .json · Public domain