Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

48 F.3d 1218

Docket No. 94-6722.

United States v. Sharp

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided March 6, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States of America v. Sadler

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Melvin Lee Sharp, Appellant pro se.

Paul Arthur Billups, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, WV, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sharp, Nos. CR-90-255; CA-93-634-3 (S.D.W. Va. May 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/48/f3d/1218 · .json · Public domain