Evers v. Tart’s Empirical Analysis
48 F.3d 319 · 1995
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 1995
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not include any individual who volunteers to perform services for a public agency which is a State, a political subdivision of a State, or an interstate governmental agency, if 4 (i) the individual receives no compensation or is paid expenses, reasonable benefits, or a nominal fee to perform the services for which the individual volunteered; and 5 (ii) such services are not the same type of services which the individual is employed to perform for such public agency. 6 29 U.S.C. Sec. 203 (e)(4)(A). The regulations define”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Evers v. Tart“as: 7 An individual who performs hours of service for a public agency for civic, charitable, or humanitarian reasons, without promise, expectation or receipt of compensation for services rendered, is considered to be a volunteer during such hours. 8 . . . . . 9 Individuals shall be considered volunteers only where their services are offered freely and without pressure or coercion, direct or implied, from an employer. 10 29 C.F.R. Sec. 553.101(a), (c). Further,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Evers v. Tart“within the meaning of the Act must be compensated according to the Act's mandatory minimum wage provisions. 29 U.S.C. Sec. 206 . The Act provides, however, that an individual performing volunteer services for units of state and local governments will not be regarded as an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Evers v. Tart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.