HBE Leasing Corp. v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis
48 F.3d 623 · 1995
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 198 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably In Re: Sharp International Corp (2005), Amsouth Bank v. Dale (2004)
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 510 · 11 U.S.C. § 548 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on Pepper v. Litton · Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. General Electric Company · Doerr v. Doerr · Carson v. American Brands, Inc. · Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. v. Strachan Shipping Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 198 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he transferee need not have actual knowledge of the scheme that renders the conveyance fraudulent. Constructive knowledge of fraudulent schemes will be attributed to transferees who were aware of circumstances that should have led them to inquire further into the circumstances of the transaction, but who failed to make such inquiry.”
20 later decisions quote this exact passage“Every conveyance made and every obligation incurred with actual intent, as distinguished from intent presumed in law, to hinder, delay, or defraud either present or future creditors, is fraudulent as to both present and future creditors.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“Fair consideration is given for property, or obligation, a. When in exchange for such property, or obligation, as a fair equivalent therefor, and in good faith, property is conveyed or an antecedent debt is satisfied, or b. When such property, or obligation is received in good faith to secure a present advance or antecedent debt in amount not disproportionately small as compared with the value of the property, or obligation obtained.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.