Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 F.3d 81 - Klos v. Haskell

Klos v. Haskell’s Empirical Analysis

48 F.3d 81 · 1995

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2017 · most notably Sandin v. Conner (1995), Pinaud v. County of Suffolk (1995)

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

200199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Hewitt v. Helms · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the state must have articulated specified 'substantive predicates' which limit the discretion of state officials; and (2) it must have employed 'explicitly mandatory language,' requiring state officials to follow those substantive predicates.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the [Supreme] Court has held that an inmate has no inherent liberty interest ... in remaining in one correctional institution rather than another”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.