Torres v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
48 F.3d 887 · 1995
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2016
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Califano v. Sanders · Dandridge v. Williams · Bolling v. Sharpe · Califano v. Yamasaki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has not shown any causal connection between the allegedly misleading language in the first two notices and his subsequent failure to seek judicial review”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If simply submitting new evidence rendered a prior decision factually distinct, res judicata would cease to exist”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.