Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 F.4th 1 - United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2022

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Puckett v. United States · United States v. Vonn · United States v. Dietz · United States v. Cotal-Crespo · United States v. Piper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “knowledge of the consequences of a guilty plea”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]here a defendant's claim would fail even if reviewed for plain error, we have often declined to decide whether the defendant's failure to raise the issue below constituted waiver or mere forfeiture.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When the issue is preserved, 'we review the district court's denial of . . . a motion [to withdraw a guilty plea] solely for abuse of discretion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.