48 F. App'x 363 - Gonzalez v. Bratton’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2021
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. · Fischer v. Maloney · Holt v. KMI-Continental, Inc. · Luciano v. Olsten Corp. · 147 F. Supp. 2d 180 - Gonzalez v. Bratton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fall[] well within the ambit of other traditional tort liability.” Gonzalez v. Bratton, 48 Fed.Appx. 363, 365 (2d Cir.2002) (citing Fischer v. Maloney, 43 N.Y.2d 553, 558 , 402 N.Y.S.2d 991 , 373 N.E.2d 1215 (N.Y.1978)); accord Herlihy v. Metropolitan Museum of Art, 214 A.D.2d 250, 262 , 633 N.Y.S.2d 106 (1st Dep’t 1995) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.