Duncan v. Miro

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-10-23

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion · Decided 2002-10-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Gene M. Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Duncan v. Miro, No. CA-01-2410-2-23 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.