48 F. Supp. 3d 428 - Levy v. Maggiore’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Basic Inc. v. Levinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A statement is considered materially misleading under § 10(b) when its representations, viewed as a whole, would have misled a reasonable investor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Plaintiff is only required to show that the source of the belief is someone in a position to have had personal knowledge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.