Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 Ill. App. 2d 487 - Cibis v. Hunt

48 Ill. App. 2d 487 - Cibis v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably 23 Ill. App. 3d 694 - Leon v. Max E. Miller & Son, Inc. (1974), 10 Ill. App. 3d 1004 - Rigor v. Howard Liquors, Inc. (1973)

26 state decisions

180196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The deposition was not signed by the deponents, nor does it contain a recital by the certifying officer that the parties waived signing. However the record does show that plaintiff s counsel was present when the depositions were taken, and that he examined each of the deponents at length. Under the circumstances we think it reasonable to assume that a copy of the deposition was available to both parties, however whether or not such is the fact we find nothing in the record indicating that in the trial court plaintiff raised any question as to the sufficiency of the deposition to meet the requirements of the Supreme Court Rule. His failure to move the trial court to suppress the deposition on the grounds raised on this appeal is unexplained. * s * [W]e hold that the deposition defects or errors of which plaintiff now complains were waived by his failure to point out the same to the trial court.” ( 48 Ill. App. 2d 487, 492-93 , 199 N.E.2d 246, 248-49 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.