State v. Cato-Perry’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen · State v. Timley · State v. McCaslin · State v. Arnett · State v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““And because alternative means questions are ultimately resolved on tire sufficiency of the evidence, that standard of review is whether, after considering all of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court is convinced that a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on each of the alternative means presented.” State v. Cato-Perry, 48 Kan. App. 2d 92, 94-95 , 284 P.3d 363 (2012) (citing State v. McCaslin, 291 Kan. 697, 710 , 245 P.3d 1030 [2011]).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jackson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.