Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 48 LAANN 1008 - State v. Hart

State v. Hart’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1997

7 state decisions

2018961900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Barrett · State v. Desforges

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ubi lex non distinguit, nec nos distinguere debemus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.